Here's a guy who has been a European pro for over 13 years now, with only 1 win under his belt. But he outplayed both Tiger and Rory (the almost completely unmentioned second place finisher), as well as the rest of the field, to take his second. Instead...it was the same old, same old.
But rather than go that direction, I want to get some opinions on another matter. This matter is, I'm sure, not new to many golf fans. But for someone like me who doesn't follow the tour, I can't seem to wrap my head around it. It's the whole appearance fee thing. I know this doesn't take place on the American tour. But paying an appearance fee is how they get some names to come out to a tournament such as the Abu Dhabi Championship. I don't know about you, but I have a slight problem with this.
For me anyway, it cheapens the tournament. The way I perceive it is, a golfer is looking at this tournament with no real interest in playing. But then they offer him money just to show up, so now he'll play? I'm sorry, but that sounds like crap to me. It sounds to me like you're running a b.s. tournament and you need to do anything you can to get people to pay attention. Is this an exhibition or is a legit tournament? Well, if you have to pay players just to show up...you tell me.
But, at the same time, I look at if from the other side. Is it a good idea? Would it get more of the tour stars to participate in more tournaments? Would some of these smaller tournaments get more attention?
Let's face it - if the PGA Tour isn't going to implement an actual season full of tournaments that matter toward some type of a real playoff system, all leading to a season ending champion, then maybe the pay-to-play system is the way to go. I hate the idea considering these players already have sponsorships, endorsements and the opportunity to win good money on the tour stops, but if that's how they can make the PGA Tour a little more exciting, then maybe that's also worthy of some consideration.
Swing 'til you're happy!